|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mark Hadden
Amarr Intergalactic Serenity Ev0ke
|
Posted - 2010.04.27 08:56:00 -
[1]
Originally by: Mikhail Dmitriev but would not allow AFK cloaking in hostile space.
there is nothing wrong about afk cloaking (in hostile space).
|
Mark Hadden
Amarr Intergalactic Serenity Ev0ke
|
Posted - 2010.05.11 11:49:00 -
[2]
Quote:
There should be no reward for inactivity.
lol, I love this one... Eve Online IS DESIGNED for playing afk!
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1300692&page=14#409
|
Mark Hadden
Amarr Intergalactic Serenity Ev0ke
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 07:21:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Mark Hadden on 14/07/2010 07:28:17
Originally by: Skunk Gracklaw I'm confused about something...if there is a player in a system who is cloaked while afk then they aren't going to be bullying anybody because...they are afk. If there is a player in a system who is cloaked and at the keyboard he will be able to manage whatever type of system is implemented to combat afk cloaking and can still "bully" you.
What this really sounds like is that the op just doesn't like cloaks and is trying to use "afk bullying" to get them nerfed.
generally, you're right. I think people would like to know if somebody afk or not in order to avoid wasting time baiting an afker (which obviously cant work lol). Either he's afk and could be scanned down (or he logs) or he's there and can be baited because he is not afk.
In my opinion afking is a good method to avoid being baited, so when I go afk its amusing how hard they must try baiting - I know they do because its their only option - while I'm doing eve unrelated things away from the computer... haha A good thing, local as intel is getting useless too if you afk a lot because they dont really know if there is anybody or not. (afk) cloaking is very fine in my opinion because it diminishes the fuggin local and baiting cost them a huge amount of time, which doesnt even work if you're smart enough.
|
Mark Hadden
Amarr Intergalactic Serenity Ev0ke
|
Posted - 2010.07.16 18:06:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Mark Hadden on 16/07/2010 18:10:24
Originally by: Valadeya uthanaras
but things remain like they are, BSA never put any decent bait, never camp any chokepoint, and come running on forum crying for CCP to make their "win sov holding space" more safe ...
sounds like a perfect place for a cloaky ganker ^^
Originally by: Mackenna I'm proposing a change that will allow us to fight if I employ a reasonable amount of skill and effort to find you, just like anywhere else in the game.
yeah, of course you propose such a change - for being able to throw all your bears on a single dude roaming your space and then go on with your PvE activities in full safety. This does not work that way and this is the reason cloaks arent detecteable, thanks CCP.
|
Mark Hadden
Amarr Intergalactic Serenity Ev0ke
|
Posted - 2010.07.17 11:38:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Mackenna
..who is most likely an alt setup specifically for the purpose of this one single, low-risk task.
..who lives there, dug in like a tick, never moving out of the system.
in other words, he's doing it right.
Originally by: Mackenna
...whose sole task is to drop cynos for his corp to come screaming through to attack miners, haulers, and carriers.
and you're mad because of it.
Originally by: Mackenna
Oh my, he needs safety... he needs to be in total control of when combat begins and with whom.
if it would be different, there were no threats in 0.0 for bears.
Originally by: Mackenna
Not just now and then, but all day every day, for as long as he can keep 2 or 3 clients connected.
yes, why not? He's paying for his 2-3 clients.
Originally by: Mackenna ...and you call me a carebear. Priceless.
yes, I still do.
|
Mark Hadden
Amarr Intergalactic Serenity Ev0ke
|
Posted - 2010.07.19 11:09:00 -
[6]
there is nothing wrong with afk cloaking. Its actually, the only threat to carebears thanks to local.
|
|
|
|